Wednesday, November 25, 2009

Zulutrade - Lot Limit and Stop Loss results

Welcome back Zulu-fans!

Well I've been promising it and here it is. To your left, please find analysis of the top 20 providers in Zulutrade after my 2 lot, 180-pip stop filter has been applied.

Before we get to lessons learned (and there are plenty), let's examine the results overall.

Of the 1084 providers analysed, only 499 (just under 50% of them made any profit at all. When I add up the total pips earned across the group, they actually lost -480,966 pips. When I sum up the draw down, that equals -1,230,294. That means the profit factor (profit earned for draw down encountered) is actually -0.39! That means the system as a whole loses money when lot limits and stop losses are used!

It's no wonder that Zulutrade won't let you filter the results for the stop and limits, because if they did so, you probably wouldn't want to trade on the system! And that's where the Zulutrade dream meets hard reality. Use of stop and position limits in general kill profitability.

I went back and ran the same stats for the database without use of stops and lot limits. For that sample, the entire system earned 667,176,917 pips but had -769,083,710 of drawdown. So for the entire system (without stops and lot limits), the profit factor is only 0.86, less than one. That means the Zulu system as a whole is a "Risky Provider" meaning drawdown exceeds profit earned!

Now let's focus on the top-20 graph from above. Most providers (with the exception of Real Conservative Trading and Crocodile have drawdowns greater than -500 pips. That's explains why I have consistently lost money on Zulutrade. Its because I usually drop providers once their drawdown exceeds 500 pips or about 5% of my original $10,000 investment. Even with the top 20 providers, you would have had an average of -717 pips drawdown.

So what does all this mean? It means that Zulutrade is mostly a losing proposition, at least from the customer's perspective. Of course, the FCM's, the Providers and Zulutrade themselves make money. But the customers have the odds against them for making any money.

Another key takeaway is that the more conservative you are with your money (by use of lot and stop losses), the more likely you are too lose it! Put another way, the use of stops and limits keep you in the game longer, but in the end, they just prolong the pain and you loose you money over a longer period of time instead of losing it all at once.

Overall, this is a pretty depressing set of circumstances. I'm going to need to assimilate these results and decide whether I want to risk any more real money with Zulutrade. I love the concept, but I'm having a hard time with the reality.

All that said, some providers do have an uncanny knack for making money, even with stops and lot limits. Some of my favorites are #16 Bigwin, #24 Coolie1997, #69 Cheetah. Cheetah himself is pretty amazing overall in that according to my simulation he earned 1123 pips with a max drawdown across trades of only -50 pips.

Another example is TheKillerz who is #124 on the filtered list with 733 net pips and 395 pips drawdown. And TheKillerz has only been active on the system for about 9 weeks! So I think you can make money with good providers overall, but if you can't handle a drawdown of -1000 pips, you're probably going to lose your nerve (and leave the table) before your provider can make your money back.

That's all for now, thanks for reading. And for those of you based in North America, have a Happy Thanksgiving!

5 comments:

  1. There are other providers I'd like to draw your attention to, which have not been detected by you or by ZuluTrade TOP blog, please check the results of the following Signal Providers..
    King Trade 2.3%
    one2three 7.1%
    SFForex 2%
    1NEARD_X 0%
    GETTIN PAID!!! 0%
    *Instant Cafe Records* 2.6%
    JEDI42 2%
    SharePips 1%
    Winpips4Us 0%
    TORA! TORA! TORA! 7.8%
    FxTeddyBear 0%
    auto-fx 7.2%

    The percentage you see in front of each provider is basically (the number of Negative Draw Downs below or equal -100 pips divided by the number of trades)

    So these providers in addition to Cheetah, Surfing and coolie1997 have the lowest DD in ZuluTrade.

    Please let us know your findings for these providers some of them made me good money.

    Regards,
    Rossco

    ReplyDelete
  2. Rossco-

    Thanks for the comment, will check out these providers and post or comment.

    Thanks again,

    Tcxmon

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks for the post Tcxmon. Your results do not surprise me. I am a little curious at how your calculations take multiple lots into consideration on some of these providers. As we know, that some use a 10x lot multiplier, or more, which skews the high and the low of the trade. At any rate, I do agree as a whole Zulutrade is a risky provider. I have always been under the thought that if there are people out there getting wealthy on currency trading, why would they ever share that with us. But my hopes are there are a couple that would do that, and I aim to find them (even if it means finding my own method, of which I may have). It does feel that all signal providers are on there to just take some risk out of currency trading by being a signal provider, and they probably don't have a lot of successful experience. All my babbling aside. Interesting that Rossco mentions "TORA! TORA! TORA!", I found 3 or 4 new providers to demo next month and he will be one of them. I would also be happy to look into the others mentioned.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Great work! You really are unmasking Zulu for what it is - another type of casino. One quibble: the spellings are 'lose' and 'losing', not 'loose' and 'loosing'. Thanks for your great contributions.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous-

    Thanks for catching that. For all my experience on the subject, you think I would know how to spell lose and losing! I updated the post with the correct spellings. Thanks.

    Tcxmon

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.